Suchergebnisse

Sorry for the delay, got caught up doing other things, however I've made the changes necessary to add 0180x or 090x numbers to the system and then using enum lookups you can get a cheaper alternative number to call if one exists in the system. I don't know what mobile charges are like in...

The reason I ask is e164.org has a Non-Geographical feature which can list tel: URIs against more expensive numbers so you get your calls cheaper. So far we have Australia, France, Spain and the UK listed, although I'll try and get time to add the information for German numbers tomorrow.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but according to wikipedia, calls to 0180 numbers cost more than to regular land lines, is there any other ranges that I should be aware of as well, other than the 090x premium rate numbers?

I have no idea what enumquery does exactly so I can't really comment much further. You can use dig naptr @<nameserver> <phone number>.e164.org ;; ANSWER SECTION: e164.org. 223974 IN NS eu.e164b.com. e164.org. 223974 IN NS pa.e164.ws. e164.org. 223974 IN NS na.e164.biz. ...

I probed all name servers and the same reply came back from all of them, is there anything that you were doing/did that caused these to disappear on enumquery?

Which number, we have a dispute system to handle the situation you are describing.

The main difference is they seem to be a co-op or a group of companies that register your number with openenum.eu, where as with e164.org you register your own numbers, I haven't completely read the entire site on policies and what not yet.

We've documented this: http://www.e164.org/wiki/DoNotCall

That should have been fixed 24 hours ago.

Probably, but there is no code for it at present, we used to have some code but that was chewing up too much CPU on the system we were running the website on so we removed it.

We used to list toll free numbers, but this was sort of misleading depending how you calculate it, now we only list numbers registered with the system, both end user and blocks, but exclude things like toll free numbers and blocks that may not delegated yet.

Well I finally brought the code up to spec to match the internet draft being written: http://wiki.taug.ca/wiki/Draft-groth-dns-encryption I produced a fastagi script that works in 1.4.x version of asterisk: http://www.e164.org/enumlookup-0.0.4.fagi The script doesn't currently verify or...

Actually GPG wasn't effected by that bug either, but the debian 'bug' wasn't the reason I choose to use GPG keys however.

Just a quick update on this, I've made a start on an internet draft document which can be found http://wiki.taug.ca/wiki/Draft-groth-dns-encryption . As above I initially was only going to use RSA+AES encryption and skip public keys/certificates but the only way to get strong crypto then would...

To improve redundancy we also have www.e164b.de, www.e164b.eu, www.e164.or.at and a few others: http://www.e164.org/wiki/Redundancy_Measures

Technically speaking nothing was broken :)

Well yes, that's why preference exists for. DNS shouldn't be relied on to have the order returned in the same way at every request. DNS is supposed to rotate the order so it was working as it was supposed to as far as I can tell.

Ummm I have no idea what you are doing exactly, but it sounds like you are book marking a page that updates something.

There is a specific page to modify the Do Not Call preferences, rather than the general enum entries.

Sorry, I still don't know how to write in German :) However, x-dnc are for Do Not Call preferences, this is documented in more detail on our wiki: http://www.e164.org/wiki/DoNotCall